
David Brooks, in a recent op-ed in the New York Times, summarized findings from new research on the study of the transition to adulthood. He focuses on "the odyssey," or the "decade of wandering that frequently takes place between adolescence and adulthood." Like in our class discussion, he notes that the pathways through this decade are diverse, and that markers of adulthood are increasingly delayed. In 1960, roughly 70 percent of 30-year-olds had left home, achieved financial self-sufficiency, married, and had children. By 2000, fewer than 40 percent of 30-year-olds had done the same. He even suggests that "with a little imagination it's possible even for baby boomers to understand what it's like to be in the middle of the odyssey years. It's possible to see that this period of improvisation is a sensible response to modern conditions."
After spending some time in FMSC 381 this semester, you might ask yourself, what is missing from Brooks' reflection on the odyssey period? One letter in response to this article came from Laurence Steinberg, a professor of psychology at Temple University in Philadelphia. He wrote:For young people from the upper-middle class, whose parents can afford to bankroll them while they experiment with careers, relationships and identities, the period between adolescence and adulthood may in fact be an odyssey of the sort that David Brooks has described. But research shows that this trend is far from universal, and before we accept the notion that a new stage of human development has emerged, it is informative to ask just how widespread it is.
Recent empirical analyses indicate that about 40 percent of American young people follow this pattern. Poor inner-city and rural youth, as well as young people who live in the so-called red states, are far less likely than their advantaged, suburban and blue-state counterparts to delay the transition into conventional work and family roles, both because they choose not to and because they simply can't afford to. Perhaps over time, the odyssey stage will come to characterize the life course of the majority of young Americans, just as adolescence began as a middle-class institution and spread to less affluent groups, but it hasn't happened yet.
Read Brooks' article first. If this decade of odyssey isn't common for all youth, how would you describe the transition into adulthood for young adults with few resources? What does fluidity and improvisation mean for young adults who do not have a support net of a promising career; an undergraduate or graduate degree; family members who will help with a downpayment on a home; or a potential partner with equal or greater earning potential? Is the transition to adulthood a time period in which, increasingly, the lives of advantaged and disadvantaged young adults diverge? How and why?